Inherent Capability Loss

The reliability and performance of any machine is determined by two factors. These are as follows:

The way the machine was designed, and

The way it is operated.

IC Loss
Model showing the definition of Inherent Capability Loss (ICL).

Expected Failures
Failure characteristics and economics are such that for some failures, the defined maintenance strategy is “No Scheduled Maintenance” (NSM)4. This may be because of the two scenarios described below:

The failure is random, and the PF interval is too short to be of any use, or

because the cost of prevention is more than the costs of the failure.


This reality means that there will be a certain level of unavailability inherent in the design and operating conditions. Failure modes which have NSM strategies will inevitably become breakdowns and result in capability loss. We call such failure modes Expected Failures. This is because over the life of the asset, it is expected that such failures will occur and result in loss of production.

Planned Maintenance
While some failures or breakdowns will be accepted as being inevitable, others will be prevented either through condition monitoring or fixed time component replacement. Where these preventive actions require that the plant is taken off line, then the preventive maintenance is another loss that is inherent.

In addition, condition monitoring may detect the onset of failure. The rectification action taken in such cases may require the plant to be taken off line. All of these losses combine to form the Inherent Capability Loss shown. The Inherent Performance Level is therefore the total time less the Inherent Capability Loss.

NOTE - It is worth noting that if the failure consequences are hazardous, a NSM strategy can not be made. In such cases, a modification is required to reduce the risk of failure to a tolerable level.

Download the full article here...003.PDF